Posted by
Toddy Littman on Wednesday, January 28, 2009 3:00:00 PM
Well....cooling or warming, it would seem our cycle of data collection isn't long enough to arrive at any sort of conclusion.
However,
if there is a warming trend, as has seemed to be evidenced at a Solar
System level with the polar caps of Mars melting, it appears our .5% of
manmade Co2 production is just enough that we are spilling out all over
the galaxy....
Or, on the other hand, maybe, just maybe, this is
a solar occurrence, a larger cycle initiated by smaller ones from that
chemical ball of light in the sky, our Star, that seems to be ignored
by almost all of science as any sort of generator of heat, especially
as a source to be checked out first.
Now if that happens to be
the case, that this is a Solar event, it would appear our efforts are
being focused inaccurately. For instance, I do not see us even thinking
of double and triple projected roofing systems for our homes,
engineered for us to survive, or how about tires made to withstand the
increase in heat that an irradic Star could produce. Nor do I see the
repeal of prohibition to using lead in paint, which would provide a
level of protection from radiation (makes ya wonder of the skin cancers
increased dramatically after that prohibited use).
See it's a
peculiar consideration to try to think of an offset for the Sun, this
thing that's the size of 10,000 Earths and provides those solar winds
and dust that our clouds come from.
Thus far it appears the jury
is out, or at least still deliberating, in regard to if there is global
warming, but should they come back and finally at least agree there is
a global warming trend, they'll likely have found it's from the Sun,
not our minuscule .5% contribution to annual global Co2 output.
The
trouble is we'll have wasted so much effort, our infrastructure
rebuilding will be so under engineered to survive because we were busy
listening to a "Tennessee Flim Flam Man" use his weight as a former
political figure, his expertise at rhetoric as a former lawyer, and
incompetence as a scientist to point everyone in another direction.
Science embraces it so easily because the term "global warming" is the
catch phrase of charities and "governments" streamline give away of
grant money worldwide.
I can say that at least Mr. Gore will
provide an alternative in financial cost to government regulatory
schemes, similar to the pollution credit system to which carbon credits
are modeled after. Makes you wonder if Bernie Madoff had anything to do
with these designs. This is particularly true in Mr. Gore being poised
to have a 1 trillion dollar fund that he controls in 10 years when the
"sheep of Washington" (as in the dollar) vote for whatever Mr. Gore can
make their bleeding heart whine about in perfect dramatic liberal
fashion, and that keeps the dependent society looking to government to
save them from ever needing a leash again.
But did anyone expect different from the "George Soros Open Society Muppet Theater of United States Government?"
Thank you for reading,
Toddy Littman