Posted by
Toddy Littman on Monday, March 30, 2009 9:00:00 AM
Many of the left have their position
that the outrage over Obama's laughter during a 60 Minutes interview is
a false outrage. Apparently they aren't good with understanding the
value of an answer in relation to it's question, and the timing of
outbursts of emotion from the person holding the office of the leader
of the free world. To them his laughter was just an emotional outburst,
that the subject matter of what is being asked, and its relation to the
rest of America and the world; the cries of "catastrophe" prior to
passage of the Obama stimulus bill which were followed by statements of
"the economy isn't as bad as people think," afterward; the new budget's
inclusion of codification of "the economic substance doctrine," and
now, calls to have Timothy Geithner be given authority to sieze banks,
that all of this, is not to be looked at together for it's tormented
confusion but merely as Obama, President of The United States, laughing
and entitled to laugh, those upset about it merely feigning outrage.
I
can assure you that if George Bush had laughed in this manner at
questions on the economy, all we would have heard from the left is a
battlecry of "Bush and the republicans do not care," or "Bush is back
on drugs again." In reality, those attacking free markets, attacking
the basis of freedom, through "regulation" they are the ones who do not
care.
Let's take a look at what 60 minutes is willing to show of the interview, on their website http://www.60-minutes.info/2009/march-222009-barack-obama-publics-anger-wall-street, please note the caption before clicking the play button states "full interview."
Now
please look at the following excerpt from the actual "full interview"
that appears entirely edited out of what is shown on the 60 Minutes
website http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNu9xjUwPEk.
This
may account for the reason the left sees President Barack Obama as just
laughing, as though only a simple moment in the interview of a mere
chuckle. I could easily agree with them if that first interview was the
full interview and such a laugh is all that occurred. But the second
excerpt tells a different story, one the left will not listen to, will
not admit, and will not give any moment of recognition because their
blindness to Obama before election, a blindness achieved by his design
solely because it is a blindness by ego, requires them to continue the
blindness, continue to stand behind him.
Obama's laughter wasn't
one of being on drugs but instead one of how well he has been able to
manipulate everyone and everything to his whim, the laughter of a
dictator. Obama has every reason to laugh with a Congress that
amplifies his socialist agenda to the heliosphere, and having fully
implemented an hyper-inflationary structure that causes capital to
leave America, Obama knows his agenda, his socialist, feudal
centralization of power agenda, is going to happen, and there is not a
damn thing the American people can do about it. He's as happy as Hugo
Chavez, Fidel Castro & Family, Putin, Adolf Hitler, or any other
leader who knows their power is ever growing and the opportunity at
full authority, sanctioned by wealthy hedge fund manager such as George
Soros and Warren Buffett, is at hand.
The left can argue the
right and it's wealth are the problem, are obstructionists, and
demonize conservatives all they wish, the table of millionaires and
billionaires assembled by George Soros to get President Obama Elected
had a collective net worth, and funds under their control, of 500
billion dollars! What we the people of the world are witnessing is the
establishment of a worldwide politburo using this crisis as the
opportunity, a politburo whose figurehead, its leader, laugh in our
faces at our stupidity overall, and conservative incapacity to do
anything about it. A man who laughs at how much more effective his
pre-election rhetoric was at misdirection while the press conveniently
failed to examine him as they did his rivals, both democrat and
republican -- fear of the charge of racism and the personal liability
attached thereto, because of the amplified sensitivity of race as an
issue, more powerful than the notion of putting a man into office who
could destroy America (Similar to the pre-911 mentality that led to
terrorists being able to gain 4 planes and that killed 3,000 Americans,
the "no one would attack America" attitude followed by conspiracy
theory after conspiracy theory to reinforce that notion, the implosive
fallout of our disbelief, again ego based.)
Welcome to "Change
We Can Believe In," a religious and cultural order, where one is taught
to always assume others are responsible, and which always leads to
blaming those same others for the ills of society as perceived in this
individual state of dependency. It is the alcoholic drinker, the
tobacco smoker, the gun hater, blaming the product for what negative
incidents that occur instead of their willingness to exercise complete
irresponsibility in the use of these products. Here they've been,
irresponsible with the wealth of their lives and blame the wealthy for
the wealthy's success, while also, at the same time, blaming the
government for failing to regulate the wealthy's success. This is not
the America our Founders sought to achieve, where everyone sought to
achieve wealth and thus all would be productive by their own will and
not at the will (pleasure) of a sovereign overlord, a Prince, titled
king, by those who manage the serfdom.
What we have today, in
President Obama's America, is the spitting image of a Crown Colony
beholden to a centralized authority, whose stranglehold on the equity
of the nation only re-establishes feudal tenure, called "tyranny" in
the modern day.
Thank you for reading,
Toddy Littman