So much to be thankful for......

History lessons appear to be the missing element of a good education anymore, I mean our own nation's rich history, a history that includes those who founded the system that embodies the meaning of The Age of Enlightenment, a system America once affectionately called "capitalism." Yet none of us learned this in school.

More odd is what capitalism has accomplished for the entire race of mankind over these 200+ years. How the idea of one owning their own property, having elected to work hard to achieve and attain it, meant first the recognition of all people as being sentient, which was the great discovery of the artisans and philosophers of The Age of Enlightenment.

But some how, instead, a system that is the mirror image of feudal rule of The Dark Ages has seized the day. A system of privileged existence under an authoritarian rule based on the "parens patriae" doctrine, a Latin legal phrase that, according to my old Blacks Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, means:

"'Parens Patriae,' literally 'parent of the country,' refers traditionally to role of state as sovereign and guardian of persons under legal disability."

Consider how many forms of medical condition exist to which one can be considered disabled, and placed on the public dole, even prisoners in prisons are considered afflicted with a particular legal disability.

Now let's take a look at Health Care again, and we'll note a grand opportunity stands before the authoritarian and rulemaking branches of the United States Government to once and for all, with the people's blessing if we support it, finally have the means to define every citizen with a legal disability according to medical records the government will have in their possession and control.

This may explain the final blows to destroy a system which the Pilgrims discovered (http://changingwind.org/index/news.php?item.32.11). A system where each is rewarded with the result, the fruit, of their own labor, a Christian tenet which is why it was one of the more begrudged issues of the actual slave ancestors of African Americans, no matter where they were worldwide, the issue that some could reap the reward of their labor, but they themselves could not. Taxes appear to be a legal mechanism of this same principle, where government acts as the master to reap a guaranteed income, even as a debt owed to government if you do not pay, based solely on government claiming this right in an individual's property.

The import of the civil war, the idea these men who were once slaves could now earn for themselves from their own labor was, and remains, the significant point of departure from slavery to civility. You see the Pilgrims, many of which came here as "indentured servants," some just to pay their passage from Europe to the United States, knew very well the state of upheaval ones mind endures when moving from the mind of being a captive peasant and slave subject to the mind of an owner and master of ones own-self, ones own-life. These men and women only knew the oppression of a structure which honored and operated according to the whim of a Sovereign government, a government that consistently asserted the denial of any rights in property to the peasantry. In fact all were subject to their very life being disposable as their right to live was entirely at pleasure of this Sovereign government, much like women will be with these new proposed rules on mammograms based on cost savings that pale in comparison to the value of peace of mind in a person's life, as well as the long term cost of those whose cancer isn't detected early and complicated by lack of such early detection. This further denies recognition of the cost upon a family when a loved one dies, both emotionally and financially, the survivors who never wanted to be, but instead wanted the best health care they could get for their mother, wife, sister, and occasionally their brother. But apparently this is the value of rationing and, according to liberal democrats, in no way, shape, or form, bares any resemblance to a "death panel," rationing, or the Canadian Health System.

And it is as though freedom in the manner that Our Founders laid out, has been lost. The strides made by capitalism have become regularly tempered since a new name for feudalism was made available by The Communist Manifesto, called Marxism, and again repackaged as "liberalism." This is a clear influence when we review the speeches of former "Green Jobs Czar" Van Jones vigorously espousing, "give them the wealth," or by then Candidate Obama, speaking to "Joe the Plumber" to explain "spread the wealth around." These speak volumes for the promotion of "government provided freedom," a subsidized life, similar to the subsidized inner city housing projects. It is this idea of government that we walked away from according to the Declaration of Independence. We have known throughout history that such a freedom, as the Pilgrims, African-American slaves, and now we, who pay half our paycheck to local, state, and nation government have found is only a freedom to produce for sake of the King, master, or other oppressive sovereign government's need to live beyond their means and further borrowed against. At current we've helped these people, enabled them to place our nation in jeopardy by paying the tax, by never questioning the government authority to do so in a vigorous manner that holds government accountable. Instead we trudge along, assuming we "can't beat City Hall." So far we've agreed to be obedient subjects of what has proven to be an oppressive political self interest structure where politicians think of themselves without any regard to the people, to the governed.

Oh a miniscule few who line these politicians pockets well gain favor of the neo-liberal political establishment. Those who give sweet heart bank loan deals to politicians and establish court case precedents finding in favor of enlarging national government power. What else, other than to regurgitate hatred for George Bush, can be at the heart of recognition that self proclaimed terrorists, who have acted upon their wish to destroy Americans in the name of Jihad, and, those enemy combatants found on the battlefield, who fired upon our blood and treasure, our soldiers, have the same Constitutional Rights as citizens of the United States of America, and deciding to hold trial of a group of them in New York? And the ultimate special interest group is of course those who bring suit regarding a carbon footprint or encroachment on "wilderness" on the grounds that these "could have a negative impact on global climate change and increase CO2 emissions while also threatening an endangered form of gnat that only grows in this area." Please note no mention of Lawyer Obama's former employer ACORN.

What these consistently ignore is the history of capitalism. Capitalism is the source of property rights due to the need for a means for protection of property by rights vested in the individual through ownership. Meaning, you paid for it, it's yours, and the responsibility of protection of that property is yours too, and by protecting your property you assert your sovereignty, your sentience.

This is why the facts of history bare out that it is from these property rights derived from capitalism there came a need for courts for individual people, courts to air out their grievances in regard to a transaction. Thus the Code of Civil Procedure and Civil Code, and the notions of a means to use a neutral forum to address disputes became the preferred means of resolving an issue, preferred versus duals, and other trials by ordeal, that usually ended with death of one of the parties, to settle disputes. This code and the procedure it implements are the very manifestation of sentience through capitalism, a recognition of the rights of the individual through their ability to generate their own money and purchase things with it to attain a level of wealth over time.

Of course from these property rights came individual rights, and eventually civil rights, though the latter remains more of misnomer and is factually a modern day event where government is conferring rights on people as their Sovereign from a Throne on High. The Emancipation Proclamation is not a recognition of rights in the people, where those who once were enslaved are included as a part of one family of free Citizens. Thus why the "freed" were not treated with the same respect by government as government is required to treat upon each and every individual Citizen. This limitation on the national government was established at the founding of the United States of America, when the first 10 Amendments to the U.S. Constitution were recognized and amended to it. Their very language indicates their tenor, intent, and purpose as limits placed upon the national government to assure no encroachment into a State or the life of a Citizen of any State. Civil rights are not such limitation, and instead are a mechanism for attaining monetary damages, often without any level of monetary interest through investment by the plaintiff, monetary interest that would of course include the rights and responsibilities that come with such investment. Today civil rights are a means for lawyers to attain settlement from successful capitalist businesses in America, a way to exploit and game the system due to liberal socialist design interpretation of the Emancipation Proclamation, something even Martin Luther King said "creates a second class citizenship in the United States" in a communication to John F. Kennedy by Western Union telegram.

It is just amazing that such a phenomenal figure in history, as Martin Luther King whose great wisdom and capability to discern the truth of things is rarely matched throughout history, has left his message in the hands of those whose entire success today is based on misrepresentation of his message by wrapping it around their own axle, an exploitation, and appeal to the worst of societal situations as an intended and caused norm of the wealthy on one group, irrespective of the government encroaching on the property of all citizens over time in such a manner that the freedoms sought by the original slaves do not even appear as phantoms, as ghosts on the edges of what we envision freedom to mean. Worse is the belief that this can only be changed by those who earned through their labor, or inheritance of others who labored, to give to the have-nots.

Who believes Martin Luther King wanted handouts? And who believes that Martin Luther King wanted those who are oppressed in slavery to, once free of bondage, be beholden to someone else for their crumbs from the Master's Table? And do you believe African American slaves, the ancestors to many American Citizens of African decent today, wanted freedom so they can ask for money from the wealthy? Utter hypocrisy to claim "our being free now gives us a right to ask you to provide for us."

And how kind of the variety of American leaders of African and slave descent to so easily throw a blanket of assumption that the negatives in society are caused by the wealth of others, irrespective of the fact that most poverty, of most people overall, is caused by those who will not take on the mantle of being an American Citizen no matter their heritage or what country they are from. For many the Christian idea of working for ones reward, of seeking personal wealth and freedom, along with the entire battery of rights and responsibility that comes with such American Citizenship, is entirely foreign as their fathers for thousands of years were taken care of by a Sovereign Ruler be it Samurai, a Crown Head of Europe, or Tribal Chieftain. So the remedy, the solution of having government encroach on the wealthy, as promoted, offered, and suggested by this variety of leaders of African and slave decent, as well as others, only continues to deny the very people who deserve to think freely the very opportunity to attain the mind of a free sovereign individual person with all the gifts of freedom they gain by individual action.

Sure some think "I own my home" ignoring that more often than not their very benefit is entirely derived from the will and whim of the state in the politicians self interest at political bidding for their vote. The end doesn't justify the means, which end in this case is the destruction of America by disempowering the people through the idea of "well it doesn't matter, I have the house." Knowing of these instances, and that this has been going on since Franklin Delano Roosevelt, hasn't the wealth, the taxpayers and producers of this nation, already paid their fair share? Sure it isn't by a court decree but the free ride many have had already on the basis of the abusive use of the Civil Rights Act and other benefits programs under FDR, appears to be a staggering amount of money, amount of exploitation, of the American People, the designated taxpayer to foot the bill. When are we the creditor here, or that the borrower is government subordinates our being the supply side of this equation? This taxing power of government is blind to the variety of ethnicities and cultures in this nation, yet does all it can to focus our attentions on differences amongst each other, apparently so we'll never have the epiphany, "it's not that poor person's who is taking from me, but the government who does, and aren't they actually giving less to these people and giving more to their pet projects, to their friends and other cronies? I've been a fool to blame anyone else!"

But I keep forgetting, this is a transformation from a nation built on the freedom of the individual to a nation built on the government issued privilege of the individual who has agreed to a life of subject dominion under the ruling class, an agreement purchased initially through the showering of benefits from a government that can't afford them except by oppression, seizure, and any other abuse of the structure of collective taxation. Health care, use of energy, and seeking to become successful by merit of production, are the casualties after the fact of borrowing from other nations-yea we are stronger now that we have foreign creditors who we must submit to, but we won't recognize the people who pay the bill, the governed, as the true creditor for our 3rd party liabilities we are foisting on they and their children. Of course our image is better around the world when we are seen weaker and actually our people agreeing to be similar to those who dislike us. Some may say they see us more akin to themselves, which very well may be true, since we have adapted the mindset of a subject people just like the people across Europe who've known thousands of years of feudal authoritarian rule.

I mean, isn't it clear that liberal America cares about only one class from the 235 legal millionaires in Congress since the last election? But to emphasize and see just how asleep we are, they are deciding to change the rule on mammograms to not cover them on women under 50 years old....Anyone upset yet? Anyone making the big ruckus and making sure the health care bill fails by 60 votes instead of 40 something?

Can you understand now why I titled the previous article as I did http://changingwind.org/index/news.php?item.62.12?

This is the same control over a people a fuhrer once had over a nation we helped destroy because it was promoting and identifying a master race to define all other races inferior, and, claiming those that are most inferior in their view are subject to extinction. Winning World War II is a testament to America that today we undermine at every turn, as though there are none in the world who would think of controlling the rest of us. They are in our midst, and, care of President Obama, they are ready and willing to carry out their duties to destroy a country that has done more for the freedom of mankind than all the other nations of the world combined. This is why we have so many enemies, so many who loathe and hate us, for our roots embody the meaning of freedom and, should our people ever wake up and seize their reign as the government of this nation that they actually were designed to have, we will again contribute to mankind in ways no other nation can resist or undermine. This is why they love our liberal president, for these enemies to the freedom of each individual of mankind, a freedom derived from self interested ownership of property that develops responsibility and sentient un-hindered and un-impinged free thinking, undermines the very weakness of individuals that those who promote, and are at the center of, collective control exploit, weaknesses necessary to gain government authoritarian dictatorial imposition of rule at their pleasure upon the governed, a power they seek merely due to their elitist belief, "I know better than you do what's good for you."


Happy Thanksgiving, it may be one of our last ones to be had as a somewhat free American People,


Toddy Littman

A firm believer in America based on America's Founders, and not those who, would and do, trespass to rewrite the Constitution as though time alone provides wisdom, irrespective of the lack of "lessons learned."  I've found a need to echo some principles that seem long forgotten.

You see these who would easily ignore the Constitution wish to apply the differences of today, changes of the modern era, as justification for changes to The Constitution assume we no longer could have a domestic enemy or the ideas of feudalism and tyranny died long ago.  Sadly they themselves by failing to know our nation, the story that is America, are not from from being that domestic enemy themselves.

Yet many who want us to believe this idea of the modern era, and their obliviosness, are well aware of getting us to believe in them as their means of success, as their way to get us to vote for them, to listen to them.  The fact they are not running for public office, nor do they have any genuine love for America is to be overlooked. That instead they see America as a tool for their own personal gain irrespective of any sacrifice to America which occurs at every encroachment upon the rights of the individual, especially property rights, is absolutely foreign to their thinking of everyone's profits as "public excess."

These people do not see our input of any import, they do not look to what we produce, desire, or our dreams and aspirations, etc., with exception of using these as a means of revenue -- a sort of blackmail (Oregon not receiving enough fuel revenues due to people buying hybrids and the whole Co2 global warming environmental thing who then pay less fuel tax and now the state wants to tax their specific mileage using GPS to track them and bill them!) These people and their propositions are the certain and specific epitome of the Feudal Exchequer.

Contrary to popular public opine, Government however is not a business, well, at least it is not a business in an elected capitalist republic (according to Franklin) featuring an administrative form of government with an arbitration by majority or greater votes depending on the circumstance.

These "liberal ideas" are the remnants of Feudal Tyrannies and their Tyrants, whether called feudalism, socialism, communism, and/or facism, etc., these "forms of government" and economy are entirely and purposefully a business run by government. These are where government is formed under the guise of "the Will of the People" but executes it's actions irrespective of their needs. Eventually everything these governments do is for the sole purpose of protecting the governmental mechanism or control of "the political means." In all cases this means the assumed control of every aspect of property, tangible and intangible, so long as it is controlled and provides a justification, another opportunity to receive more revenues for the government. This more often results in government claims over rights, or protections from and, to intangibles claiming a duty and obligation, that these are a "necessary act of government."

Historically these duties and obligations always seem to come with a form of "generating revenue" for government, government "eating out" our "substance" and new expenditure systems that allow our honorable elected to abscond with funds generated by the new tax irrespective of it's imposition on other grounds.

The above described Feudal Tyrannies and the variety of names in "re-branding" the Feudal ideology of government owning everything it claims any interest in, of course also erects an invisible line, a border, which rises up into infinity from the very core of the Earth. This border outlines the outer edges of every property these governments claim, including we the People, as "resources," and "subject to" their administration of our lives -- to in our best interest but as a means to generate revenue for the government.

And all within this border, as decreed by government of course, is further subject to "schemes" (they use this term in their own government codes) to afford expansion of government within this border -- a condensation of government power -- justified on "the revenues government needs" to "effectively carry on the business of government."

As with when we were under the old Feudal Tyrants and Lords, nothing belongs to us outright, everything by permission, by privileged grant to those who seek it; always a "contingent" or "public" interest in the private lives of the people to claim such permission is necessary and justified, along with the "fee" associated with the permission -- the fee another "revenue."

Some may find this comforting, and I submit that since 911, some information should be shared, but, not for taxation, not for government to adjust it's revenue notions and see how it can spend more (say $700 billion), merely creating a debt on our backs, to justify another assessment and tax under the guise of "to pay off this debt." See it doesn't matter who is bailed out, that's the "red herring."

What does matter is that government, even for a moment, felt it was, it is, so empowered as to agree to such an expenditure at all. This is the Feudal Lord, the King or Queen, the Tyrant, spending and justifying the expense even if there is no means to afford it but to oppress the people. This may have meant killing a number of them merely to not be required to have as much food in storage for the winter. This may mean selling off lands and a noble to another nation so as to increase the Sovereign's Wealth so they can afford that artist's monument to their last conquest, and get it finished before they die so the next in the "blue blood" line doesn't interfere.


In particular to the "$700 Billion Bailout" consider how 95% of America was against it at the time (and 80% still), that this opposition led to failure in the House. This is important because it had no revenue generation provisions in it, it was not a "Bill for raising Revenue" as that requires certain rules, house rules, before such a bill can even reach the floor of the house. This is a protection that we the People want and is in recognition of U.S. Constitution Article I, Section 7. To be clear, the original $700 Billion Bailout failed without having any revenue generating provision in it. Our Constitution makes it very clear that....

"All bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills." (Article I, Section 7, main body of the U.S. Constitution.)

Harry Reid demonstrated the very essence of feudal tyranny. Even after the house vote on this bill had failed to pass it, in adherence to the will of the people, he used the Amendment Clause to now add revenue provisions to the dead bill (thus the revenue portion did not originate in the House and does not provide the people with the protections they should have been afforded). The Senate then passes this new version of this now $850 Billion Bailout packaging it specifically as an amendment to another bill (the revenue provisions are now 3 layers deep from being legitimate according to the U.S. Constitution.). Harry Reid, knew exactly what he is doing, if you look at the record and what votes they had, the packaging being very particular to pass this bill, you'll find Harry Reid did not care about the Will of the People. See this isn't about if we need the Bill or not, it is about government acting on the basis of what we've indicated we want or do not want versus acting on their own accord, as though our input doesn't matter. This is absolutely the means and control of Feudal Tyranny irrespective of it's brand.

Yet few Americans know anything about the Constitution, other than "I claim my rights under the Constitution" not even realizing that their rights are not subservient to the Constitution, and our rights have never derived from the Constitution. Thus we haven't any idea how or what to do, nor will we act, when government is acting without us, without consideration of us as anything but a vote to keep those in power holding a seat -- power they were meant to have as a matter of carrying out our will, of carrying out the propositions of the The Unanimous Declaration of Independence.


The U.S. Constitution, main body, is the one and only supreme, absolute, and certain directive of administration of the governing the United States of America in a fair and just manner, and yet, the Original 13 Colonies required the Bill of Rights to be ratified with the U.S. Constitution. I must say again, The U.S. Constitution, main body, is the one and only supreme, absolute, and certain directive of the administration of governing the United States of America.

The "Bill of Rights," of course, has become a bit vague as a term since it is used as an affectionate colloquialism we've applied to the ratified First 10 Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. This is in contradistinction to the "Bill of Rights" being the title to a particular document with 12 Articles for Amendment, the last 10 of which are the first 10 Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. The original 13 colonies, now forming into states "all-at-once" essentially, found it necessary to require this Bill of Rights Document be ratified in order to assure greater limitation on the centralization of power in a national government, to assure a "Federal" Government, even beyond the founders original main body.

You see after being under Feudal Tyrannies for a good 1500 years, which are a "civilized" form of Tribalism and slavery of one's own people, our Nation's Founders found themselves very unwilling to centralize any power under any form of national government figurehead, be it a prince, singular or even as a body with 3 parts, or just under the banner "government."

This is why our national government is referred to as a "Federal" government." The powers of the federal government are entirely circumscribed by the 10th Amendment where the States, or even the People, claim such right, then such powers are not delegated by the U.S. Constitution to the administration of government in the United States. Now of course the U.S. Supreme Court has found, since around the Civil War, that the National Constitution is "the Supreme Law of the Land" however, the trouble is that the Constitution itself indicates this in a more limited capacity:

"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding." (U.S. Constitution Article 6)

Note the condition, "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof...." This directs in no uncertain terms the need for every single law, every single act to be in pursuance of The Constitution, a document of limited government powers. Each act must be in pursuance of the proper administration of a government to the principles of the documents whose force and effect is not excluded, and was a legislative enactment by it's own words "In Congress Assembled....The Unanimous Declaration of Independence."

It is important to note that the Declaration of Independence is the only founding document that received unanimous consent, and therefore, has greater authority than even the U.S. Constitution where Rhode Island would not sign.

So now when we go back to Harry Reid picking up a Bill the House had voted down and that had no revenue provisions, thereafter adding another $150 Billion in "Christmas Trees," and adding "Bills for raising Revenue" by amendment, or in itself, making the new $850 Billion Bailout a "Bill for raising Revenue" we find this act is not in pursuance of "This Constitution," the very document that prohibited what Harry Reid did.


This is why our expansion of our national government, cannot be into a central government, and such expansion is not in the best interest of America. This is also why the founders love of freedom and the experiences which forged these principles so strongly in them that they made this written Constitution with such limitations and clauses to assure we, the governed, remain in grant of our consent to the government. This is why this same power has been extended to everyone in this nation by the 14th Amendment.

Understand that there are many who from the Founding of the United States of America miss central government and continue to long for the "Blue Blood" reign. These are people whose families would have loved to have been the dominating Lord of one of the colonies granted by Letters Patent of a Crown Head of Europe. These people have and continue to choose to interpret our Constitution to meet those ends, and not the ends of our Unanimous Declaration of Independence, nor to meet the conditions ironed out over 11 years of discussion, meetings, and secrecy from 1778-1789 to produce the Constitution of the United States.

ChangingWind.Org intends and is meant to preserve this knowledge, this ideology that manifest into a nation through these founding instruments and those who worked so hard, so diligently, to put them together, fight for them afterwards up to this day, and, whose remnant of reasonableness began to be lost to distant memory under FDR. Of course with the passage of time, and something the Feudal ideologists count on, the zeal for freedom, its recognition and defense, has since declined and almost entirely a non existent voice of knowledge and wisdom from the people who brought about the largest wealth redistribution program ever: The Founders of the United States of America.

Our founders know Feudalism under any brand, its properties a defined certainty that cannot be masked, cannot be mistaken for something else, or glazed over. Our Founders, these people who were born into feudal slavery, even as a noble "at pleasure of the King [or Queen]," they fought for better for all of us and, together with Lincoln, did all they can to assure this promise extends to everyone equally. It is up to us to take up this mantle. We must make sure these freedoms and their extension of equal representation, the works of these so very many people beginning in 1641 and continuing through the Founders of the United States to Lincoln, are not lost.

When someone wonders what America is, read the U.S. Constitution. Read the Federalist Papers. Learn of the life of serfdom and caste society, a structure that insects live by and are born into as well (as we once were, it is nice to be able to write that), "peonage" is the life Our Founders left behind and did all they could to assure none of us would ever experience again as Americans.

Learn about the first attempt to leave the crown in 1641 by 5 of the plantations, and the first codification of laws in 1643. These define America, for they define our Spirit of defiance to oppression. We are defiant of man being viewed, comprehended, treated, and used as a substance and resource subject to the control of other men purely due to their claims of right to do so and without care or consideration whatsoever of our claims that they cannot, that their "sentience" is no greater than my own, irrespective of anything they have to claim -- there is no justification for anyone to believe in any manner they are in the position to determine the fate, the life, the future, of another.

Elite status is a myth, conjured up for those who want to portray importance to whatever they are promoting as granting them an elevated condition over others.

Generally these "elitists" have their "alphabet soup" after their name and are looking to bring others to grant the same significance of meaning to these that these people found in pursuing these letters -- an acknowledging qualification that they believe should grant some sort of authority over those without it. things from those who didn't.

Titles of any kind, be it President, etc. are of similar significance in a free nation and to a free people. These things only command respect out of those who glory in it, who desire to find significance in it. Those who have these titles have no right to force anyone else to recognize this significance and thereby derive no right to dictate others lives, what they do with their property, or if others are capable of managing themselves.

In a free nation there is no criteria but freedom and that, if one is representing government, they adhere to the principles of The Unanimous Declaration of Independence -- our foundation as a nation -- or they no longer have the consent of the governed, no right to "wield" any sword of authority or claim any such right.

Fights for freedom in every form, from our nation's wars with England to a prison riot, are a testament to the value of freedom. And when we act accordingly, when government uses a clear head and reason to achieve results that haven't anything to do with their own best interest, it is at that moment of such achievement that governance is occurring and not "the business of government" -- something that clearly has been forgotten in light of this revenue generation structure where government is guaranteed an income irrespective of nature not providing such guarantee to anyone who they rely upon for such revenue.

This is not to say that there is no government interest involved, it is to say that those representing government have a duty to remember it's place, and theirs in it, as an administrator, and recognize that pursuant to those instruments which founded our government, the source of it's legitimacy: American Government interest is subservient to the States and the People.

This is vital to a free people, free nation, free society, and free markets. Any regulation, even by measure and opining of the importance of the measure, is a threat to freedom by threatening these, a threat that occurs by the slightest suggestion of "normal" or "tradition." America isn't about tradition or we'd have never left the Crowns of Europe, we never would have ceased to continue our vassalage and subject slavery (serfdom).

Thus and so I am guilty of being an American. I am guilty of promoting the Founders Values and Beliefs as the conservative and republican values they actually are. I am guilty of believing a free nation can only remain free if the people are willing to take part, to make it their duty to be informed (This is not to be confused with the ad infinitum conjecture that can and has often developed into a conspiracy theory, usually intertwining with another conspiracy theory, as though knowledge of such things, the "specialness of it," will help anything.)

Reason is a tool that can fool if not used wisely. It is the heart of freedom when adopted by a mass of people who arrived at the conclusion through use of reason and in repulsive reflex to their abject condition, a worldwide right of the sentience of mankind. Reason is the heart of tyranny when used by a few to spread rumor, gossip, and other theory as though fact, "in arguendo," to lead one to believe this suggestive "talk" is true, and only so as to get them to apply reason to such fallacy and manipulate them or a situation.

It is in the repulsive reflext to our abject condition that our nation was founded, and, that a republican named Abraham Lincoln risked this nation in a Civil War to assure these principles have no limit through the administration of our Federal Government.


Lastly, few realize the very essence of freedom, the spirit of this country, derives from capitalism because it is the most significant and symbolic departure from Feudal Europe.

"But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them [the People] under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security"

"Security" here is meant everything, that, "Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness" are "among" the "certain Unalienable Rights" each of us is "endowed with by their Creator." Thus "future Security" is an assurance that this limited group of Unalienable Rights as well as those not enumerated -- other rights these are "among" -- is defended, upheld, and protected by a government structure designed to do so by written constitutional direction to administer itself with these fair, just, and proper ends as the goal and purpose of the administration of our United States Government.

Our Congress has long since deviated from this principle. Though they have the "Power of the Purse" under the Constitution they continue to carry on "political tradition" and blame the outgoing unpopular President, the most politically "safe" position, for economic woes. Congress cannot, nor will they ever, take responsibility for poor economic conditions, or better said by our Founders in The Unanimous Declaration of Independence, for being poor "Guards for" our "future security."


Thank you for reading.


Toddy Littman

Of course liberal Congress needs to hear from their most noted funding source, George Soros, responsible for the organization of 70 millionaires and billionaires to assure Obama's win (http://www.nraila.org/Issues/Articles/Read.aspx?ID=322)
and to do all they can to put an end to the greatest threat to those who use wealth as a means of dictatorship: gun ownership, irrespective of 2nd Amendment Gun Rights in America.


A Little History

I won't go into one of my long winded discussions of the man who told the poor people of Rosia Montana village in Romania they don't get to own 20% of a thriving gold mine while George Soros has competing gold holdings.  This is after his Open Society Institute destroyed 10 years of work to open the gold mine this village of impoverished Romanians would own 20% of and greatly looked forward to, http://reportfromrosia.com/?m=200707.  A more detailed account of the entire affair is here, http://www.postchronicle.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi?archive=46&num=121582.

A Canadian Firm had invested close to 300 million dollars over the last 10 years to open the Rosia Montana Mine in Romania, cell phone tower licensing was in the works since there aren't any towers in the area, however Soros, using the Ministry of Environment, brought their environmental review to a halt indefinitely.  They haven't been denied nor approved, the process just halted.

Soros has been personally responsible for contributing 100s of millions of dollars to various "former soviet block" nations in his "philanthropy."  Few realize Soros is merely throwing money at governments and "almost governments" with almost no economy or stability short of bribery and corruption.  But these are also nations Soros has precious metals or other interests in and will protect from any competition, even if it means starving a village of Romanians further.  Russia used to mine this particular Rosia Montana Mine but after the fall of the Soviet Union the mine has not been worked.  This mine also has a history with the NAZI regime.  The following article goes into the Rosia Montana Mine history more http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/driessen083107.htm.

Of course this isn't the first time George Soros has shown his desire to influence and even control a government, http://newsbusters.org/blogs/bill-hobbs/2007/12/10/soros-using-environmental-scare-tactics-gain-control-gold-mine.


What about American Resources?

Consider the above in light of our own use of our own oil reserves, some of which have been re-evaluated at 9 times what we originally thought, and, MoveOn.org, a George Soros enterprise, making it clear their $88 million raised for Obama requires him to do as he promised them, http://sev.prnewswire.com/publishing-information-services/20081105/DC4416105112008-1.html.  And luckily for the liberals George Soros finally gets a win http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/12/26/elec04.prez.bush.soros.reut/.  Note that this means 300 million people are to be subjected to 4.5 million people's demand that Barack Obama does their will.


Soros:  An Equal Opportunity International Scofflaw

Here is a wonderful International Herald Tribune article about George Soros conviction in France being upheld by their Supreme Court.  http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/03/24/business/soros.php.  Last I knew France is an ally and a friend of the United States.  I cannot understand letting someone who doesn't honor French laws and courts, and, evades ours law by running a hedge fund off our shores, illegal since FDR, without paying any income taxes due to the United States, or virtually any government worldwide, is allowed to speak before our Congress.

However Soros, who promotes the idea of "spread the wealth" by backing Barack Obama, will not pay the 2.2 million dollar fine for insider trading, money the French Government surely could use.  No no, Soros in fact wants to turn his insider trading case into an international case to take to the World Court to be vindicated, and of course then be able to sue the French Government, so it is acting in Soros' best interest as well.  Let us not forget this is "the man who broke the bank of England," http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_143947.html, and I quote:

"In 1992, Soros won the title the "man who broke the Bank of England" when his speculations and machinations helped devalue the British currency. Many governments believe that he triggered the Asian economic crisis that began in 1997, was involved in the Mexican bailout with their President Ernesto Zedillo. Most recently, Soros worked on the Euro, pushing the U.S. dollar down to a near all-time low.

He was convicted in 2002 of insider trading in France and fined $2.2 million. George dismissed this finding as 'a odd decision' and said that he would file an appeal. ...."

Conclusion

Only in America could a man with the character above be allowed to speak before Congress as an expert in financial matters.  But then again this is the new "Liberal America" and Soros is the new "Stalin shadow" of Barack Obama by private politburo finance -- and liberals thought the 50% owned by Lyndon Johnson's estate in Halliburton was bad! 

Soros, like Obama, says everything we want to hear but at the same time asserts what we've all known is all wrong.  In light of the above, can anyone trust George Soros?  And if not, can Congress trust George Soros?  Notice that Soros wants his philosophy, that he discusses at the end of the following interview, to rule the way we think, the way we go about our solutions, as though George Soros is presiding over governments and their people.  Bill Moyers, having worked for Soros for 3 years in OSI, makes it easy to know how Soros plans to influence the situation, to distort the facts for "Soros's self interest" and socialism.  Listen to our world leader, our Dictator George Soros for yourself, be careful for he's selling something:  your gullibility -- http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/10102008/watch.html. 

Thank you for reading.

So it appears a socialist is going to be voted in for sake of personal emotion, that we lack the capacity to see the larger effect, to put our country first, that we fail to recognize we are the final bulwark of our freedoms, a duty our Founders so wisely placed upon us by our Constitution and it's republic element, The House of Representatives.  Maybe they, like we, gave too much credit to the future, though ours by our complacency and taking for granted, and thus we appear to deserve what we get this election.

What is truly sad here:  Obama and his foreign investor contributors, especially George Soros, are merely repeating the blueprint of what's been done throughout the world, Hugo Chavez's rise to power in Venezuela most recently.  This "blueprint" is before us, obvious by the assault on our economy from within (FeddieMac, FannieMae, Paulson, and Congress), a blueprint we're blind to by our selfish emotional reaction to the assault itself. 

I find this sad because America, the one nation in the world that trusted it's people from the foundation of its national government, set aside that trust in us in the name of greed and, what Madison called, "the old trick of turning every contingency into a resource for accumulating force in the government." Those elected Administrators of Our Will in Washington, D.C. have repeated the very history of transgressions by the King of England that led to the founding of the United States of America.

What's worse is so much of it is because we the people haven't cared enough to love our country in the first place, because we foolishly have taken for granted these principles of freedom our Founders laid out, as though etched in granite and entitled without earning them, without respecting their meaning, purpose, and exercise. 

Due to our irresponsible behavior we've discounted, even forgotten, our enemies who desire to remove these principles to this day, to claim them a defeated philosophy as they have in recent weeks through their new mouthpieces of socialist agenda, enemies our benevolence and grace have disallowed us to vanquish throughout our nations victorious history.

The future generations of our enemies have arrived, with their ideals firmly in place and a plan to implement them against Our Will.  We've been caught flat-footed, not realizing our Founders battle to establish this great nation was only the beginning, that this battle must continue throughout the existence of The United States of America and we, the Founder's Posterity. 

Though Franklin told us they'd created "a republic if you can keep it," we believed our freedom was secured and irreversible.  We assumed to make no effort of keeping our freedoms, we set aside our guardianship of these most fundamental and sacred principles of freedom that derived from The Enlightenment:  All people are sentient.  And now more than ever we demonstrate otherwise and have grown fat, grown drunk, with the entitlement principle, an arrogant path of almost no effort while expecting to receive great gains. 

Our enemies, those who knew our lust for gain in this manner would buy them political favor as it has every ruthless government system throughout history, especially the one our Founders threw off, are at our door, knocking by the word "change," to further exploit the entitlement principle, perfect our demoralization and annhilate Our Will.

Recognize it is this principle which makes our vote all the more important and at the same time underwhelming as it is cast for the only competitively viable candidate so as not throw our vote away.  Make no mistake, this too is by design of the enemies of the United States of America.

We can only hope that if we save his chance to be President of the United States of America that he will not institute an entirely socialist agenda, though we expect some to occur due to his reaching across the isle.  This hope is more than we can begin to believe at all of the socialist dictator running for office, Senator Barrack Obama.

I wonder what the 56 men who Founded our nation would do right now. 

I'd imagine they'd rally a great clamoring of Americans to physically appear at The House of Representatives.  The Founders would have assured we'd have met beforehand amongst as many of us as possible, proposing solutions and quickly deciding the best one, to then arrive on the steps of the capital together, as the government of this nation we are "of, by, and for the people."

It is We The People's initiative that founded this nation, that organized elective state and national governments, who incorporated influences of the French and those Indian tribes who exhibited a civil society we hadn't seen before and yet had no King.  We designed to institute a government amongst us to secure life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  We did not in any way whatsoever design to institute a government to dictate what these mean, how they'll function and define the limits to our liberty, that we already had in the King of England.

Now is the time we must again seize Our Mantle of Authority that we vested in others, to administer Our Will, that these others fail to recognize, and appear more than happy to destroy along with the very foundations that give us this Right of Will over our country.

Let us act and act swiftly to work out our proposals and then meet in Washington D.C. to achieve our redress of grievance, to demand our proposals be done.  We must re-instill faith in our government by infusing ourselves as the personal guardians of this nation's principles, the Masters of our government that we once were.  Now is the time that we must be what our Founders foresaw of us in authority to defend our nation from all enemies foreign and domestic!

For our enemy is now domestic by claim and foreign by their philosophy, it is time we reigned our nation Proud and Honorable once more.

Thank you for reading.


References:

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=OowxMcVTjTE

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=08iomNFrzU4

http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/10/shocker-obamas-muslim-outreach-advisor.html

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=PsIW7OYHdGo&feature=related